What’s Wrong with a little bloodsport?
![]()
Terry Eagleton in the New Statesman on Christopher Hitchens (via readysteadybook):
I just turned down the offer of a public debate with him in the States. I’ve said what I want to say, and we wouldn’t have got anywhere – it would only have been a sort of bloodsport.
Even then, Christopher was mesmerised by the idea of America. He always wanted a bigger scene.
What was definitive for him, politically, was the fatwa against Salman Rushdie in 1989. I think that was the turning point. The deep Islamophobic impulse he has stems from that. But he’s still an idiosyncratic mixture of various political attitudes that don’t always go together.
And I wouldn’t for a moment underestimate his formidable eloquence and intellectual resources. I think he is a superb writer. But I think that the radical was always at war with the public school boy who wanted to succeed.





